Life doesn’t come with trigger warnings, and neither should college

davis1

I refuse to send my kids to any college that is dealing with this PC, safe space, Title IX, trigger warning, micro-aggression NONSENSE!! I hope all of the fascists devour themselves in their little temper tantrum revolution going on right now.

It’s only going to ensure a republican sweep of state houses, governorships and, um…the presidency (and then the Supreme Court nominees). Keep it up comrades! People are tired of ultra liberal PC whining right about now.

Someone needs to say “ENOUGH!!!”

As some have said to me a while ago…MAN UP! Someone has to be on charge. I sure as hell would never allow my kids to run my home. Why let bratty rich privileged white AND BLACK kids(and all others) run a college?!?!?

Sit your ass down and learn a few things.
Once they graduate, there are no safe spaces. Huckleberry Finn and Uncle Tom’s a Cabin will have words that certainly will offend and no one will pull them off the shelves because there is no trigger warning on the bookshelf. Someone will call you fat, ugly, stupid, dumb and possibly the..N word…eventually. No, you can’t run to the police. And bad sex sure ain’t always “sexual assault.”

I saw this nonsense coming when I first learned about enthusiastic consent from cults 5 years ago. I saw it all unfold.

Now it’s coming back to bite them in the tooshie (is that word safe spaced enough to not trigger a warning?)

 

Geez…

 

And we have stuff like this:

At Wellesley, controversy erupted when a sculpture depicting a pale man sleepwalking in his underwear appeared on campus. Hundreds of students signed a petition to have it moved, calling it “a source of apprehension, fear, and triggering thoughts regarding sexual assault.” To her credit, the university’s president declined to have the sculpture moved.

At Brown, a campus debate on sexual assault alarmed students who worried one of the speakers would offend rape survivors. They protested to the school’s president, who then scheduled a simultaneous panel discussion to reflect their point of view.

In April, the Asian-American Students Association at Brandeis shone a spotlight on microaggressions with a display of the stupid things people say to Asians (“Why do you all hang out together?”). But other Asian-American students felt the display itself was a microaggression. Rather than debating that absurd position, the association apologized and removed the installation.

This all starts with good intentions: It’s laudable to want to protect trauma survivors. And it makes sense for a professor so inclined to give a heads-up that material might be graphic or disturbing. But it’s a short hop from noble goals to absurd practices: demands for trigger warnings for “The Great Gatsby”; a professor disciplined for using the term “wetback” in a lesson on racism; official sexual assault policies at Tufts and Brandeis that come with their own trigger warnings (because reading them could make you think of assault, which might be upsetting).

The absurd can get serious fast. Harvard Law professor Jeannie Suk has written of students requesting that the topic of rape law be excluded from their exams lest they be traumatized and underperform. Fearing career-threatening student complaints, Suk wrote, new teachers are not teaching rape law at all.

Is this what we really want? To have law students discomfited by talk of rape forcing teachers to forgo the subject entirely?

I feel bad for your schools. Trying to comply with expansive federal laws against discrimination and protect free speech, they are erring on the side of the former, and in so doing are abandoning their missions — the free, and sometimes fractious, exchange of ideas.

Read the rest HERE: https://www.bostonglobe.com/metro/2015/09/12/life-doesn-come-with-trigger-warnings-and-neither-should-college/5yoEMRtkVtjht4O7V2pXQK/story.html#comments

No rational reasons to oppose feminism? – By Jack V. Butler Jr.

No rational reasons to oppose feminism? – By Jack V. Butler Jr. – a comment found on Facebook.

This video and the explanations below are a few of the many, many reasons why I am 100% opposed to the ideology of modern feminism and everything that it represents.

Jack’s comment was written in response to this ridiculous video.

These women actually wonder why so few women want to be associated with a cult like theirs? Good grief:

 

No rational reasons to oppose feminism? – By Jack V. Butler Jr.

How about we start with the fact that some feminists really do advocate the systematic death (or at the very least, mass castration) of the entire male gender, and the mainstream, moderate, reasonable portions of feminism either make excuses for these women at worse, and simply ignore, tolerate them at best rather than speak out against these bigots?

How about the fact that the modern feminist movement has a history of marginalizing women of color, transwomen, poor women, and any woman who chooses to be a stay-at-home mom rather than seeking out a career outside the home?

How about the fact that it has been absolutely proven that feminist academics have purposely distorted data in order to meet the ideological ends of the movement? For example, one feminist sociologist who quoted a study on domestic abuse utterly ignored the studies findings that men were abused just as often by their female partners as the women studied were abused by their male partners. And this was only one person; there have been dozens of similar cases. By ignoring and covering up the truth regarding legitimate research in such a manipulative and cynical fashion, they not only have thrown doubt on the legitimacy of feminism, they’ve also dishonored themselves as scholars and scientists.

How about the fact that, even worse than the previous reason, on occasion feminist academics have simply fabricated studies whole out of the cloth. The best example is the “Superbowl Rape Day” myth that claimed that more women were raped and battered on Superbowl Sunday than on any other day of the year. When the facts of this myth were checked, it turned out that the “study” on which this myth was based was entirely fictional. No such study was ever concluded. In addition, when further investigated, it was found that the source of this myth was actually a feminist group in the Denver area, who apparently just made it up out of thin air.

How about the fact that feminists have purposefully impeded research studies that showed that feminist ideology had little to no relationship with reality? They did this by harassing researchers, making death threats to both the researchers and their families, organizing protests, lobbying to have research funding cut in areas the feminists did not approve, and otherwise make things difficult for the researchers. Studies into female perpetration of domestic violence and rape are particularly favorite targets for this sort of action.

How about the fact that, when they tried scaring off and interfering with the researchers mentioned in my last paragraph, and failed to keep the scientists from completing their study, they would then go into action to make sure the results of the study were either drowned out before it could reach mass media attention, or else was outright suppressed by legislation and public censorship?

How about the fact that feminists continue to spread myths and lies that even they know have been long shown to be false, despite the fact that they know damned well that what they are spreading is bullshit? I’m talking about things like the wage-gap myth, or the “only 2% of rape accusations are false” myth, or the “women only batter men in self-defense” myth, or the “rule of thumb” myth. They know that these things are utterly untrue and have been proven utterly untrue, but they spread these lies intentionally anyway because doing so helps the cause. Even when presented with conclusive evidence that they are promoting bullshit, feminists refuse to back down from it.

How about the fact that feminists discuss boys as if they were animals in need of training, but speak of girls as if they were precious gems that need to be protected? Girls are treasures, boys are a threat.

How about the fact that feminists abandon any pretense at fairness or equal treatment when it comes to the rule of law by advocating insane, discriminatory laws and practices that actively benefit women (and women only) and actively harm men (and only men). They have pushed for laws that utterly remove Constitutional protections and void due process for men accused of rape or domestic violence. (Note: not “convicted of rape or domestic violence”, accused.) They advocate for laws such as the Violence Against Women Act, which not only treats men in a prejudicial and discriminatory fashion, it ignores the fact that men are the majority victims of violent crime in the United States.

How about the fact feminists claim that their movement is both a “woman’s movement” and a “movement for gender equality” without any awareness of the inherent contradiction in those claims?

How about the fact that feminists claim that their movement is “the only equality movement we need,” but when pressed to address some male-oriented gender issues, refuse to do so because “men should create their own movement to address those problems.” That would be the same movement they previously said was unnecessary because feminism was “the only equality movement we need.”

How about the fact that, when men do go ahead and create their own movement to “address those problems”, the feminists immediately label such a movement as misogynist, hateful, and harmful to women?

How about the fact that feminists constantly equate an opposition to feminism with an opposition to women, when the truth is that “feminism” does not equate to “women”? (One is a political movement, one is a human demographic.)

How about the fact that feminists use obvious fallacy and bad logic to ignore any evidence presented that men are often just as oppressed in our modern society as women are, but in different areas and in different manners?

How about the fact that, most frequently, the response feminist give to honest criticism isn’t an honest reply, but rather a shaming tactic meant to silence the critic without having to deal with the points they bring up?

I don’t know… the more I think about it, the less I think feminism is salvageable. It may be time for “rational” feminists to abandon the movement to the fringe wackadoos and start something new that isn’t tainted by the sexist bullshit of the loud-mouth man-haters.

But I think I’ve shown that there are, in fact, rational reasons to oppose feminism.

And opposition to feminism isn’t misogyny. Its just opposition to feminism.

Hooking Up When You’re an Anti-Rape Activist

  

Why would any heterosexual, 100% male, higher testosterone, fully confident man EVER want to get close to one of these horrific women. 

Fellas…stay as far away from these women (and men) as you can!!!

She animatedly tells a story about a recent Tinder rendezvous: “One time, I agreed to meet with this guy at 8 or 9 at night. Before we met, I said to him, ‘This is the work I do, I know the chief of police … so, don’t try and get creepy; I know all my rights.’ And five minutes later, he was like, ‘Actually, I’m really not OK with how you just assume I’m a bad guy. And I get very bad vibes from that, so we shouldn’t hang out anymore.’”
“I was in a rage. He was a total fuckboy about consent,” she said.

A great comment from the article:

Datawoman3 days ago

“What kind of woman opens with a discussion about rape and consent, and then is surprised and dismissive when a guy declines to meet with her?”

“It’s almost like saying, “I know you’ll want to have sex with me, once we meet, so here are the ground rules, you potential rapist””

“When I go on a first date, I like to know the person a little better before I tell them how to not rape me.”

Read the rest here: http://nymag.com/thecut/2015/10/hooking-up-when-youre-an-anti-rape-activist.html#

Angry feminist attacks Dr Umar Johnson in public

This interesting interaction between Dr Umar Johnson and a feminist in Kansas City was interesting to observe. It also gives us a lot to talk about when it comes to being able to draw a line between advocating for the black family vs. being anti-gay or homophobic.

The discussion is important for black people in terms of helping us to learn what role we as a community can and should play in the debate over women’s rights, gay rights and everything else. Rather than attacking the black community for not being in alignment with whites, it might be best for us to determine our own position.